Tax Court of Canada Rules (General Procedure) (SOR/90-688a)

Regulations are current to 2012-05-14 and last amended on 2008-11-20. Previous Versions

When May Examination be Held

  •  (1) A party who seeks to examine an appellant for discovery may serve a notice to attend under section 103 or a list of written questions under section 113 only after the reply has been filed and served and, unless the parties agree otherwise, a list of documents under section 81 or 82 has been filed and served.

  • (2) However, where it appears to the Court that it would be just to allow a party to examine an appellant for discovery other than in accordance with subsection (1) it may so direct.

  • (3) A party who seeks to examine a respondent for discovery may serve a notice to attend under section 103 or a list of written questions under section 113 only after the respondent has delivered a reply or where the time to do so has expired and, unless the parties agree otherwise, after the examining party has served a list of documents under section 81 or 82.

  • SOR/2007-142, s. 12.

Scope of Examination

  •  (1) A person examined for discovery shall answer, to the best of that person’s knowledge, information and belief, any proper question relevant to any matter in issue in the proceeding or to any matter made discoverable by subsection (3) and no question may be objected to on the ground that

    • (a) the information sought is evidence or hearsay,

    • (b) the question constitutes cross-examination, unless the question is directed solely to the credibility of the witness, or

    • (c) the question constitutes cross-examination on the affidavit of documents of the party being examined.

  • (2) Prior to the examination for discovery, the person to be examined shall make all reasonable inquiries regarding the matters in issue from all of the party’s officers, servants, agents and employees, past or present, either within or outside Canada and, if necessary, the person being examined for discovery may be required to become better informed and for that purpose the examination may be adjourned.

  • (3) A party may on an examination for discovery obtain disclosure of the findings, opinions and conclusions of an expert engaged by or on behalf of the party being examined that relate to a matter in issue in the proceeding including the expert’s name and address, but the party being examined need not disclose the information or the name and address of the expert where,

    • (a) the findings, opinions and conclusions of the expert relating to any matter in issue in the appeal were made or formed in preparation for contemplated or pending litigation and for no other purpose, and

    • (b) the party being examined undertakes not to call the expert as a witness at the hearing.

  • (4) A party may on an examination for discovery obtain disclosure of the names and addresses of persons who might reasonably be expected to have knowledge of transactions or occurrences in issue in the proceeding, unless the Court orders otherwise.

  • SOR/93-96, s. 13;
  • SOR/2008-303, s. 14.

Effect of Refusal

  •  (1) Where a party, or a person examined for discovery on behalf or in place of a party, has refused to answer a proper question or to answer a question on the ground of privilege, and has failed to furnish the information in writing not later than ten days after the proceeding is set down for hearing, the party may not introduce at the hearing the information refused on discovery, except with leave of the judge.

  • (2) The sanction provided by subsection (1) is in addition to the sanctions provided by section 110.