-
[...]
-
[...]
The producer designates the chainring as an intermediate material and determines that, because all of the non-originating materials that are used in the production of the chainring undergo an applicable change in tariff classification set out in Schedule 1, the chainring would, under subsection 3(2) qualify as an originating material. The cost of the non-originating materials used in the production of the chainring is therefore not included in the value of non-originating materials that are used in the production of the bicycle for the purpose of determining the regional value content of the bicycle. Because the chainring is designated as an intermediate material, the total cost of the chainring, which is $10.60, is treated as the cost of originating materials for the purpose of calculating the regional value content of the bicycle. The total cost of the bicycle is determined in accordance with the following figures:
[...]
-
[...]
The ability to designate intermediate materials helps to put the vertically integrated producer who is self-producing materials that are used in the production of a good on par with a producer who is purchasing materials and valuing those materials in accordance with subsection (1). The following situations demonstrate how this is achieved:
Situation A
A producer located in a CUSMA country produces a bicycle that is subject to a regional value content requirement of 50% under the net cost method. The bicycle satisfies all other applicable requirements of these Regulations. The producer purchases a bicycle frame, which is used in the production of the bicycle, from a supplier located in a CUSMA country. The value of the frame determined in accordance with subsection (1) is $11.00. The frame is an originating material. All other materials used in the production of the bicycle are non-originating materials. The net cost of the bicycle is determined as follows:
[...]
The regional value content of the bicycle is calculated as follows:
The regional value content of the bicycle is 76.5% and the bicycle, therefore, qualifies as an originating good.
Situation B
[...]
The producer does not designate the bicycle frame as an intermediate material under subsection (6). The net cost of the bicycle is calculated as follows:
|
Costs of the bicycle frame (not designated as an intermediate material) ($) |
Additional costs to produce the bicycle ($) |
Total ($) |
The regional value content of the bicycle is calculated as follows:
The regional value content of the bicycle is 42.9% and the bicycle, therefore, does not qualify as an originating good.
Situation C
[...]
The producer designates the frame as an intermediate material under subsection (6). The frame qualifies as an originating material under subsection 3(2). Therefore, the value of non-originating materials used in the production of the frame is not included in the value of non-originating materials for the purpose of calculating the regional value content of the bicycle. The net cost of the bicycle is calculated as follows:
|
Costs of the bicycle frame (designated as an intermediate material) ($) |
Additional costs to produce the bicycle ($) |
Total ($) |
The regional value content of the bicycle is calculated as follows:
The regional value content of the bicycle is 76.1% and the bicycle, therefore, qualifies as an originating good.
-
[...]
Producer A, located in CUSMA country A, produces switches. In order for the switches to qualify as originating goods, Producer A designates subassemblies of the switches as intermediate materials. The subassemblies are subject to a regional value content requirement. They satisfy that requirement and qualify as originating materials. The switches are also subject to a regional value content requirement and, with the subassemblies designated as intermediate materials, are determined to have a regional value content of 65%.
Producer A sells the switches to Producer B, located in CUSMA country B, who uses them to produce switch assemblies that are used in the production of Good B. The switch assemblies are subject to a regional value content requirement. Producers A and B are not accumulating their production within the meaning of section 9. Producer B is therefore able, under subsection (6), to designate the switch assemblies as intermediate materials.
If Producers A and B were accumulating their production within the meaning of section 9, Producer B would be unable to designate the switch assemblies as intermediate materials because the production of both producers would be considered to be the production of one producer.
-
Example 5: Single producer and successive designations of materials subject to a regional value content requirement as intermediate materials
Producer A, located in a CUSMA country, produces Material X and uses Material X in the production of Good B. Material X qualifies as an originating material because it satisfies the applicable regional value content requirement. Producer A designates Material X as an intermediate material.
Producer A uses Material X in the production of Material Y, which is also used in the production of Good B. Material Y is also subject to a regional value content requirement. Under the proviso set out in subsection (6), Producer A cannot designate Material Y as an intermediate material, even if Material Y satisfies the applicable regional value content requirement, because Material X was already designated by Producer A as an intermediate material.
-
Example 6: Single producer and multiple designations of materials as intermediate materials
[...]
Producer X uses the self-produced materials in the production of Good O, which is exported to CUSMA country Y. Materials A, B and C qualify as originating materials because they satisfy the applicable regional value content requirements.
Because none of the self-produced materials are used in the production of any of the other self-produced materials, then even though each self-produced material is subject to a regional value content requirement, Producer X may, under subsection (6), designate all of the self-produced materials as intermediate materials. The proviso set out in subsection (6) only applies if self-produced materials are used in the production of other self-produced materials and both are subject to a regional value content requirement.
-
[...]
The following are examples of accessories, spare parts, tools, or instructional or other information materials that are delivered with a good and form part of the good’s standard accessories, spare parts, tools, or instructional or other information materials:
-
[...]
It is determined that the water flow sensor is a non-originating material. The cost of the moulds that is recorded on the books of Producer A is expensed in the current year. Under section 4 of Schedule 6, the value of the moulds (see subparagraph 4(1)(b)(ii) of Schedule 6) must be included in the value of the water flow sensor by Producer A when calculating the regional value content of the well-water pump. The cost of the moulds, although recorded on the books of producer A, cannot be included as a separate cost in the net cost of the well-water pump because it is already included in the value of the water flow sensor. The entire cost of the water flow sensor, which includes the cost of the moulds, is included in the value of non-originating materials for the purposes of calculating the regional value content of the well-water pump.