Criminal Proceedings Rules for the Superior Court of Justice (Ontario) (SI/2012-7)

Regulations are current to 2018-10-03 and last amended on 2014-01-01. Previous Versions

Form 18-A1Report to Trial Judge

SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE (ONTARIO)

Pre-trial Judge: blank line

Date: blank line

Is a further pre-trial recommended? Yes □ No □

Should a Rule 29 Case Supervision judge be appointed? Yes □ No □

Should a S. 551.1 Case Management judge be appointed? Yes □ No □

Regina v.blank line

Summary of Charges:blank line

blank line

blank line

blank line

blank line

Synopsis attached

Counsel:

Crown -blank line

Defence -blank line

TRIAL READINESS ISSUES
Juryblank lineChallenge for Causeblank lineNon-jury
Time Estimates:Applicationsblank lineTrialblank line
FILINGS:
DatePer RulesIssueCrownDefence
1. blank lineblank lineblank line
2. blank lineblank lineblank line
3. blank lineblank lineblank line
4. blank lineblank lineblank line
5. blank lineblank lineblank line
OTHER ISSUES TO BE ADDRESSED BEFORE TRIAL:
DateIssueCrownDefence
1. blank lineblank line
2. blank lineblank line
3. blank lineblank line
4. blank lineblank line
5. blank lineblank line

In providing times estimates, Pre-trial judges must include time for the trial judge to prepare rulings on applications.

  • 1 Chronology:

    • a) Date(s) of Offence(s): blank line

    • b) Date of Arrest: blank line

    • c) Date of Committal for Trial: blank line

    • d) Date Indictment filed: blank line

  • 2 Form of Judicial Interim Release

    • a) Is the accused detained in custody on this/these charges? Yes □ No □

    • b) Is the accused detained in custody on any other charges? Yes □ No □

  • 3 Preliminary Inquiry: □ Length: blank line Waived □

    Discovery: □ Length: blank line

    Transcript(s): Available: blank line Date Ordered: blank line

  • 4 Disclosure: Complete: Yes □ No □

    • a) Outstanding Issues: blank line

      blank line

      blank line

    • b) How outstanding issues to be addressed: blank line

      blank line

      blank line

  • 5 Mode of Trial: Current Election: Judge and jury □ Judge alone □

    • a) Will there be a re-election to be tried by: Judge and jury □ Judge alone □

    • b) Is there any prospect of a re-election? Yes □ No □

    • c) Will the Crown consent? Yes □ No □

    • d) Additional comments regarding re-elections: blank line

      blank line

    • e) Challenge for Cause: Yes □ No □

      • (i) Parks Yes □ No □

      • (ii) Publicity Yes □ No □

      • (iii) Other, please specify: blank line

        blank line

      • (iv) Will there be an application by the accused under s. 640 (2.1) ordering the exclusion of all sworn and unsworn jurors until the jury is selected, and that the same two triers be used for all challenges? Yes □ No □

      • (v) Will there be an application by the accused for any other form of exclusion order, or in relation to the triers, not relying on s. 640 (2.1)? Yes □ No □

        blank line

        blank line

      • (vi) Does the Crown consent to the application noted above? Crown: Yes □ No □

        blank line

        blank line

        blank line

      • (vii) Will there be an application for the judge to direct that 13 or 14 jurors be sworn pursuant to s. 631(2.2)?

        blank line

        blank line

        Crown: Yes □ No □

        Defence: Yes □ No □

        Does the other party consent to the order? Yes □ No □

        blank line

        blank line

      • (viii) Will there be a request under s. 631(3.1) for the judge to order the names and numbers of jury panel members to be called out in court?

        Crown: Yes □ No □

        Defence: Yes □ No □

    • f) Does the accused have or seek an order under s. 530 that his/her trial be held in French or as a bilingual trial? Yes □ No □

    • g) Does the Crown oppose the order(s)? Yes □ No □

    • h) If opposed, how does the defence intend to establish the evidentiary basis for the application(s)?

      blank line

    • i) Does the Crown oppose the proposed method of introducing the evidence? Yes □ No □

    • j) Pre-trial judge’s time estimate for application:

      Evidence blank line Argument blank line

    • k) Pre-trial judge’s Directions and Recommendations re. timing of application(s), filing requirements and evidentiary basis, including whether applications(s) should be heard before the trial date:

      blank line

      blank line

      blank line

      blank line

      blank line

      blank line

  • 6 Pre-trial Motions on the Indictment N/A □

    • a) Quash committal for trial Yes □ No □

    • b) Quash indictment Yes □ No □

    • c) Quash a count(s) in indictment:

      • (i) relying on s. 581(1) Yes □ No □

      • (ii) relying on s. 581(3) Yes □ No □

    • d) Sever count(s) in indictment Yes □ No □

    • e) Sever accused Yes □ No □

    • f) Particulars Yes □ No □

    • g) Change of venue Yes □ No □

    • h) Amendment(s) Yes □ No □

    • i) Pre-trial judge’s Directions and Recommendations re. timing of application(s), filing requirements and evidentiary basis, including whether applications(s) should be heard before the trial date:

      blank line

      blank line

      blank line

      blank line

Crown Pre-trial motions
  • 7 Statements of the Accused N/A □

    • a) Is the Crown seeking to obtain rulings as to the admissibility of Statements to Persons in authority? Yes □ No □

    • b) Brief summary of important contents of the statement(s): blank line

      blank line

      blank line

    • c) Is the Crown seeking to introduce the statement? Yes □ No □

    • d) Is the Crown seeking only a ruling as to admissibility? Yes □ No □

    • e) Does the defence dispute admissibility? Yes □ No □

    • f) Brief summary of defence position: blank line

      blank line

    • g) Form of statement: Oral □ Written □ Audiotaped □ Videotaped □

    • h) If the statement is audio or video taped, is there a transcript? Yes □ No □

    • i) If no transcript is available, will the Crown provide one in advance of trial? Yes □ No □

    • j) Date to be made available: blank line

    • k) Length of statement(s) (minutes/hours for audio/videos to be played, and/or transcript length, if applicable): blank line

      blank line

    • l) Voir dire required Yes □ No □

    • m) Voir dire issues:

      • recipient as a person in authority Yes □ No □
      • Voluntariness Yes □ No □
      • s. 10 (a) Yes □ No □
      • s. 10 (b) Yes □ No □
      • s. 7 Yes □ No □
    • n) Number of witnesses to be called on voir dire:

      Crown blank line

      Defence blank line

    • o) Pre-trial judge’s time estimate for voir dire:

      Evidence blank line Argument blank line

    • p) If there is more than one issue, do counsel agree that a blended voir dire is appropriate? Yes □ No □

      Comments: blank line

      blank line

      blank line

    • q) Pre-trial judge’s Directions and Recommendations re. timing of application(s), filing requirements and evidentiary basis, including whether applications(s) should be heard before the trial date:

      blank line

      blank line

      blank line

      blank line

      blank line

      blank line

  • 8 Other Disreputable Conduct Evidence, including Similar Fact N/A □

    • a) Is the Crown seeking to introduce prior disreputable conduct evidence, relying on incidents not covered by the indictment? Yes □ No □

    • b) Nature of Evidence: blank line

      blank line

      blank line

      blank line

    • c) Does the Crown seek to have admissibility determined in pre-trial motion? Yes □ No □

    • d) If the Crown does not seek to obtain a ruling before trial starts, when does the Crown wish to have the voir dire? blank line

      blank line

    • e) Does the defence dispute admissibility? Yes □ No □

    • f) How does the Crown propose to introduce the evidence on the voir dire?

      • (i) Viva voce evidence Yes □ No □

      • (ii) Agreed Statement of facts Yes □ No □

      • (iii) Witness statements Yes □ No □

      • (iv) Transcripts Yes □ No □

    • g) Does the defence consent to the manner in which the Crown seeks to introduce the evidence on the voir dire? Yes □ No □

    • h) Comments: blank line

      blank line

    • i) Is the Crown seeking to rely on disreputable conduct evidence, relying on the counts in the indictment? Yes □ No □

    • j) Pre-trial judge’s time estimate for voir dire:

      Evidence blank line Argument blank line

    • k) Pre-trial judge’s Directions and Recommendations re. timing of application(s), filing requirements and evidentiary basis, including whether applications(s) should be heard before the trial date:

      blank line

      blank line

      blank line

      blank line

      blank line

      blank line

  • 9 Hearsay Evidence N/A □

    • a) Does the Crown seek to introduce any evidence relying upon a common law exception to the hearsay rule? Yes □ No □

    • b) If yes, what is the nature of the evidence? blank line

      blank line

      blank line

      blank line

    • c) What is the common law exception upon which the Crown relies? (i.e. dying declaration, spontaneous exclamation, declarations in furtherance of common unlawful design): blank line

      blank line

    • d) Does the defence contest admissibility? Yes □ No □

    • e) How does the Crown propose to introduce the evidence on the voir dire?

      • (i) Viva voce evidence Yes □ No □

      • (ii) Agreed Statement of facts Yes □ No □

      • (iii) Witness statements Yes □ No □

      • (iv) Transcripts Yes □ No □

    • f) Does the defence consent to the manner in which the Crown seeks to introduce the evidence on the voir dire? Yes □ No □

    • g) Comments: blank line

      blank line

    • h) Pre-trial judge’s time estimate for voir dire:

      Evidence blank line Argument blank line

Principled Exception to the Hearsay Rule N/A □

  • a) Does the Crown seek to introduce any evidence relying upon the principled exception to the hearsay rule? Yes □ No □

  • b) If so, what is the nature of the evidence? blank line

    blank line

    blank line

    blank line

  • c) Does the defence contest admissibility? Yes □ No □

  • d) Contested issues:

    • necessity Yes □ No □
    • reliability Yes □ No □
    • prejudicial effect/probative value Yes □ No □
  • e) How does the Crown propose to introduce the evidence on the voir dire?

    • (i) Viva voce evidence Yes □ No □

    • (ii) Agreed Statement of facts Yes □ No □

    • (iii) Witness statements Yes □ No □

    • (iv) Transcripts Yes □ No □

  • f) Does the defence consent to the manner in which the Crown seeks to introduce the evidence on the voir dire? Yes □ No □

  • g) Comments: blank line

    blank line

  • h) Pre-trial judge’s time estimate for voir dire:

    Evidence blank line Argument blank line

  • i) Pre-trial judge’s Directions and Recommendations re. timing of application(s), filing requirements and evidentiary basis, including whether applications(s) should be heard before the trial date:

    blank line

    blank line

    blank line

    blank line

    blank line

  • 10 After the Fact Conduct Evidence N/A □

    • a) Will the Crown be seeking to tender any evidence of after the fact conduct by the accused? Yes □ No □

    • b) If so, what is the nature of the evidence? blank line

      blank line

      blank line

    • c) Does the defence contest admissibility? Yes □ No □

    • d) How does the Crown propose to introduce the evidence on the voir dire?

      • (i) Viva voce evidence Yes □ No □

      • (ii) Agreed Statement of facts Yes □ No □

      • (iii) Witness statements Yes □ No □

      • (iv) Transcripts Yes □ No □

    • e) Does the defence consent to the manner in which the Crown seeks to introduce the evidence on the voir dire? Yes □ No □

    • f) Comments: blank line

      blank line

    • g) Pre-trial judge’s time estimate for voir dire:

      Evidence blank line Argument blank line

  • h) Pre-trial judge’s Directions and Recommendations re. timing of application(s), filing requirements and evidentiary basis, including whether applications(s) should be heard before the trial date:

    blank line

    blank line

    blank line

    blank line

  • 11 Intercepted Private Communications N/A □

    • a) Does the Crown seek to introduce wiretap evidence? Yes □ No □

    • b) Brief overview of evidence: blank line

      blank line

    • c) Does the defence require a voir dire to determine admissibility? Yes □ No □

    • d) Brief overview of defence position: blank line

      blank line

    • e) Authorization: consent, s. 184.2 □ Authorization, s. 186 □ Other □

    • f) Issue to be litigated: facial validity □ Sub-facial validity □ Other □

    • g) Pre-trial judge’s time estimate for voir dire:

      Evidence blank line Argument blank line

    • h) Pre-trial judge’s Directions and Recommendations re. timing of application(s), filing requirements and evidentiary basis, including whether applications(s) should be heard before the trial date:

      blank line

      blank line

      blank line

      blank line

  • 12 Other legal issues requiring rulings anticipated by Crown: N/A □

    • a) blank line

    • b) blank line

    • c) blank line

    • d) Does defence contest admissibility?

      • a) Yes □ No □

      • b) Yes □ No □

      • c) Yes □ No □

    • e) Pre-trial judge’s time estimates:

      • a) Evidence blank line Argument blank line

      • b) Evidence blank line Argument blank line

      • c) Evidence blank line Argument blank line

    • f) Pre-trial judge’s Directions and Recommendations re. timing of application(s), filing requirements and evidentiary basis, including whether applications(s) should be heard before the trial date:

      blank line

      blank line

      blank line

      blank line

      blank line

  • 13 Competency of Witnesses N/A □

    • a) Does the Crown/defence intend to call any witness who is under the age of 14? Yes □ No □

    • b) Does the Crown/defence intend to challenge the capacity of any witness on the basis of mental capacity? Yes □ No □

    • c) Name of witness, and basis of challenge: blank line

      blank line

    • d) Defence position: blank line

      blank line

    • e) Pre-trial judge’s time estimate:

      Evidence blank line Argument blank line

    • f) Pre-trial judge’s Directions and Recommendations re. timing of application(s), filing requirements and evidentiary basis:

      blank line

      blank line

      blank line

      blank line

      blank line

  • 14 Manner in which evidence is to be introduced N/A □

    • a) Does the Crown or defence seek to have any witness evidence introduced?:

      • i) by video link, pursuant to s. 714.1 or 714.2? Yes □ No □

      • ii) by reading in evidence previously taken pursuant to s. 715? Yes □ No □

      • iii) by videotaped evidence, pursuant to s. 715.1? Yes □ No □

      • iv) by closed circuit link or behind a screen, pursuant to s. 486.2? Yes □ No □

      • v) other means? Details: blank line

        blank line

    • b) Does the opposing party consent to the admissibility of the evidence in the manner proposed? Yes □ No □

    • c) Will the Crown or any witness apply for an order pursuant to s.486, appointing counsel to cross-examine the witness, if the accused is not represented by counsel? Yes □ No □

    • d) Does the accused oppose the making of the order? Yes □ No □

    • e) If manner of introducing evidence on order is contested, pre-trial judge’s estimated time for:

      Evidence blank line Argument blank line

    • f) Pre-trial judge’s Directions and Recommendations re. timing of application(s), filing requirements and evidentiary basis:

      blank line

      blank line

      blank line

      blank line

      blank line

      blank line

  • 15 Support Person N/A □

    • a) Will any Crown witness require a support person, pursuant to s. 486.1(1)? Yes □ No □

    • b) Details: blank line

    • c) Will any Crown witness require a support person, pursuant to s. 486.1(2)? Yes □ No □

    • d) Details: blank line

    • e) Does the defence oppose the order? Yes □ No □

    • f) If opposed, pre-trial judge’s estimated time for:

      Evidence blank line Argument blank line

    • g) Pre-trial judge’s Directions and Recommendations re. timing of application(s), filing requirements and evidentiary basis:

      blank line

      blank line

      blank line

      blank line

      blank line

      blank line

  • 16 Publication Bans/Deferred Publication Orders N/A □

    • a) Does the Crown seek an order pursuant to s. 486.4 or 486.5, banning the publication of the complainant’s identity? Yes □ No □

    • b) Does the defence oppose the order? Yes □ No □

    • c) Does either party seek other publication bans or deferred publication orders?

      • Crown: Yes □ No □
      • Defence: Yes □ No □
    • d) If yes, provide details of order sought, media to be notified, timing of hearing, time estimate for hearing: blank line

      blank line

    • e) Does the other party oppose the application? Yes □ No □

    • f) Pre-trial judge’s time estimates, if application to be contested:

      Evidence blank line Argument blank line

    • g) Pre-trial judge’s Directions and Recommendations re. timing of application(s), filing requirements and evidentiary basis:

      blank line

      blank line

      blank line

      blank line

      blank line

      blank line

  • 17 Privilege Issues N/A □

    • a) Will the Crown be raising issues of privilege? Yes □ No □

    • b) Will the defence be raising issues of privilege? Yes □ No □

    • c) Nature of evidence and issue of privilege: blank line

      blank line

      blank line

    • d) Basis upon which the party seeking admission rely. blank line

      blank line

    • e) How does the party claiming privilege seek to introduce the evidence on the voir dire?

      • (i) Viva voce evidence Yes □ No □

      • (ii) Agreed Statements of Fact Yes □ No □

      • (iii) Witness statements Yes□ No □

      • (iv) Transcripts Yes □ No □

    • f) Does the other party consent to the manner in which the evidence will be introduced on the voir dire? Yes □ No □

    • g) Pre-trial judge’s time estimate for voir dire:

      Evidence blank line Argument blank line

    • h) Pre-trial judge’s Directions and Recommendations re. timing of application(s), filing requirements and evidentiary basis, including whether applications(s) should be heard before the trial date:

      blank line

      blank line

      blank line

      blank line

      blank line

Defence Pre-trial Applications
  • 18 Challenge to Legislation: N/A □

    • a) Specifics of challenge: blank line

      blank line

    • b) Does the Crown oppose the application? Yes □ No □

    • c) Pre-trial judge’s time estimate for voir dire:

      Evidence blank line Argument blank line

    • d) Pre-trial judge’s Directions and Recommendations re. timing of application(s), filing requirements and evidentiary basis:

      blank line

      blank line

      blank line

      blank line

      blank line

      blank line

  • 19 Applications to Stay Proceedings based upon: N/A □

    • a) Abuse of Process □

    • b) Charter breach, s. 7 □

    • c) Charter breach, s. 11(b) □

    • d) Entrapment (after finding of guilt) □

    • e) Other □

    • f) Overview of Defence position: blank line

      blank line

      blank line

    • g) Overview of Crown position: blank line

      blank line

      blank line

    • h) Pre-trial judge’s time estimate for application:

      Evidence blank line Argument blank line

    • i) Pre-trial judge’s Directions and Recommendations re. timing of application(s), filing requirements and evidentiary basis, including whether applications(s) should be heard before the trial date:

      blank line

      blank line

      blank line

      blank line

      blank line

  • 20 Applications to Exclude Evidence other than a statement based upon s. 24(2) alleging breaches of: N/A □

    • a) s. 7 □

      s. 8 □: warrantless search □ search warrant □ order □ authorization □

      Issue: facial validity □ sub-facial validity □ execution □

      Other: blank line

      s. 9 □

      Other: blank line

    • b) Defence position(s) re. nature of breach and evidence sought to be excluded:

      • i) Appl. #1: blank line

        blank line

      • ii) Appl. #2: blank line

        blank line

      • iii) Appl. #3: blank line

        blank line

    • c) Crown’s position(s) re. nature of breach and evidence sought to be excluded:

      • i) Appl. #1: blank line

        blank line

      • ii) Appl. #2: blank line

        blank line

      • iii) Appl. #3: blank line

        blank line

    • d) Do all counsel agree the applications can be heard in a combined voir dire? Yes □ No □

      Comments: blank line

      blank line

      blank line

    • e) Pre-trial judge’s time estimates:

      • Appl. #1: Evidence blank line Argument blank line
      • Appl. #2: Evidence blank line Argument blank line
      • Appl. #3: Evidence blank line Argument blank line
    • f) Pre-trial judge’s Directions and Recommendations re. timing of application(s), filing requirements and evidentiary basis, including whether applications(s) should be heard before the trial date:

      blank line

      blank line

      blank line

      blank line

      blank line

      blank line

      blank line

      blank line

      blank line

      blank line

  • 21 Third Party Records Applications: N/A □

    • By Defence: Yes □ No □
    • By Crown: Yes □ No □
    • a) Relying upon: Mills, s. 278.2 Yes □ No □ O’Connor Yes □ No □

    • b) Nature of Records: blank line

      blank line

    • c) Position of other party: blank line

      blank line

    • d) Should the application be heard in advance of the trial date? Yes □ No □

      Comments: blank line

      blank line

      blank line

    • e) Pre-trial judge’s time estimate for application:

      Evidence blank line Argument blank line

    • f) Pre-trial judge’s Directions and Recommendations re. timing of application(s), filing requirements and evidentiary basis, including whether applications(s) should be heard before the trial date:

      blank line

      blank line

      blank line

      blank line

  • 22 Evidence of the Complainant’s Prior Sexual Activity – s. 276 N/A □

    • a) Brief outline of evidence. blank line

      blank line

      blank line

    • b) Does the Crown contest admissibility? Yes □ No □

    • c) How does defence propose to introduce evidence on voir dire?

      • (i) viva voce evidence Yes □ No □

      • (ii) agreed statements of facts Yes □ No □

      • (iii) witness statement Yes □ No □

      • (iv) other blank line

    • d) Does the Crown consent to the manner in which evidence is proposed to be called? Yes □ No □

    • e) Pre-trial judge’s time estimate forvoir dire:

      Evidence blank line Argument blank line

    • f) Pre-trial judge’s Directions and Recommendations re. timing of application(s), filing requirements and evidentiary basis, including whether applications(s) should be heard before the trial date:

      blank line

      blank line

      blank line

      blank line

      blank line

  • 23 Evidence of Other Suspects N/A □

    • a) Nature of Evidence: blank line

      blank line

      blank line

    • b) Does the Crown contest admissibility? Yes □ No □

    • c) Pre-trial judge’s time estimate for voir dire:

      Evidence blank line Argument blank line

    • d) Pre-trial judge’s Directions and Recommendations re. timing of application(s), filing requirements and evidentiary basis, including whether applications(s) should be heard before the trial date:

      blank line

      blank line

      blank line

      blank line

      blank line

  • 24 Character of Victim N/A □

    • a) Nature of Evidence: blank line

      blank line

    • b) Does the Crown contest admissibility? Yes □ No □

    • c) Pre-trial judge’s time estimate for voir dire:

      Evidence blank line Argument blank line

    • d) Pre-trial judge’s Directions and Recommendations re. timing of application(s), filing requirements and evidentiary basis:

      blank line

      blank line

      blank line

      blank line

      blank line

      blank line

  • 25 Other legal issues defence counsel anticipate will arise: N/A □

    • a) blank line

    • b) blank line

    • c) blank line

    • d) Does Crown contest admissibility?

      • i) 
        Yes □ No □
      • ii) 
        Yes □ No □
      • Yes □ No □
    • e) Pre-trial judge’s time estimates:

      • i) 
        Evidence blank line Argument blank line
      • ii) 
        Evidence blank line Argument blank line
      • Evidence blank line Argument blank line
    • f) Pre-trial judge’s Directions and Recommendations re. timing of application(s), filing requirements and evidentiary basis, including whether applications(s) should be heard before the trial date:

      blank line

      blank line

      blank line

      blank line

      blank line

  • 26 Expert Witnesses N/A □

  • 26.1 Crown Witnesses

    • a) Does the Crown intend to call expert witnesses? Yes □ No □

    • b) Field(s) of expertise: blank line

    • c) Issues upon which the evidence will be introduced: blank line

      blank line

    • d) Does the defence contest the admissibility of the expert evidence? Yes □ No □

    • e) Basis upon which admissibility of evidence contested:

      •  legal relevance

      •  logical relevance

      •  necessity in assisting trier of fact

      •  absence of an exclusionary rule

      •  expert’s qualifications

    • f) Comments: blank line

      blank line

      blank line

    • g) Pre-trial judge’s time estimate for voir dire:

      Evidence blank line Argument blank line

    • h) Pre-trial judge’s Directions and Recommendations re. timing of application(s), filing requirements and evidentiary basis, including whether applications(s) should be heard before the trial date:

      blank line

      blank line

      blank line

      blank line

      blank line

  • 26.2 Defence Witnesses N/A □

    • a) Does the defence intend to call expert witnesses? Yes □ No □

    • b) Field of expertise: blank line

    • c) Issues upon which the evidence will be introduced? blank line

      blank line

    • d) Does the Crown contest the admissibility of the expert evidence? Yes □ No □

    • e) Basis upon which admissibility of evidence contested:

      •  legal relevance

      •  logical relevance

      •  necessity in assisting trier of fact

      •  absence of an exclusionary rule

      •  expert’s qualifications

    • f) Comments: blank line

      blank line

      blank line

    • g) Pre-trial judge’s time estimate for voir dire:

      Evidence blank line Argument blank line

    • h) Pre-trial judge’s Directions and Recommendations re. timing of application(s), filing requirements and evidentiary basis, including whether applications(s) should be heard before the trial date:

      blank line

      blank line

      blank line

      blank line

      blank line

  • 27 Position of Accused in Court

    • a) Will there be an application to have the accused sit at counsel table? Yes □ No □

    • b) Does the Crown consent? Yes □ No □

    • c) If opposed, Pre-trial judge’s estimated time for:

      Evidence blank line Argument blank line

    • d) Pre-trial judge’s Directions and Recommendations re. timing of application(s), filing requirements and evidence to be called:

      blank line

      blank line

      blank line

      blank line

      blank line

      blank line

  • 28 Absence of Accused from Court N/A □

    • a) Will there be an application for the accused to be absent from the trial, pursuant to s. 650(2)? Yes □ No □

    • b) If yes, what is the basis for the application? blank line

      blank line

    • c) Does the Crown consent? Yes □ No □

    • d) Comments: blank line

      blank line

      blank line

  • 29 Position of the Parties

    • a) Have the positions of counsel changed from those expressed on their pre-trial forms? Yes □ No □

    • b) If so, provide details: blank line

      blank line

      blank line

    • c) Pre-trial judge’s comments: blank line

      blank line

      blank line

  • 30 Fitness to Stand Trial N/A □

    • a) Will the Crown raise the issue of the accused’s fitness to stand trial? Yes □ No □

    • b) Will the defence raise the issue of the accused’s fitness to stand trial? Yes □ No □

    • c) If raised, will the application be opposed? Yes □ No □

    • d) Pre-trial judge’s time estimate for voir dire:

      Evidence blank line Argument blank line

    • e) Pre-trial judge’s Directions and Recommendations re. timing of application(s), filing requirements and evidentiary basis:

      blank line

      blank line

      blank line

      blank line

      blank line

  • 31 Interpreters N/A □

    • a) Does the accused require an interpreter? Yes □ No □

    • b) If yes, for which language(s)? blank line

    • c) Do any Crown witnesses require an interpreter? Yes □ No □

    • d) Do any defence witnesses require an interpreter? Yes □ No □

    • e) If yes, for which language(s)? blank line

    • f) Should two interpreters be required? Yes □ No □

    • g) Comments: blank line

      blank line

  • 32 Additional Courtroom Equipment required N/A □

    • a) Elmo projector Yes □ No □

    • b) Television and VCR Yes □ No □

    • c) Television and CD player Yes □ No □

    • d) Television and DVD player Yes □ No □

    • e) Hearing devices Yes □ No □

    • f) Teleconference facilities Yes □ No □

    • g) Other blank line

  • 33 Courtroom Security Issues N/A □

    • a) Does any party believe that increased courtroom security issues are raised in this case? Yes □ No □

    • b) Details: blank line

      blank line

      blank line

    • c) Comments: blank line

      blank line

      blank line

  • 34 Other Potential Legal Issues N/A □

    blank line

    blank line

    blank line

    blank line

    blank line

    blank line

    blank line

    blank line

    blank line

  • 35 Is it reasonably anticipated that any of the following defences/triable issues will be raised?

    •  Accident

    •  Alibis

    •  Automatism

    •  Causation

    •  Compulsion

    •  Consent

    •  Defence of property

    •  Did the alleged event occur?

    •  Diminished capacity

    •  Duress

    •  Entrapment

    •  “Evidence to the contrary”

    •  Honest, but mistaken belief in consent

    •  Identity

    •  Intoxication

    •  Knowledge

    •  Necessity

    •  Not criminally responsible

    •  Possession

      •  Was the possession for the purpose of trafficking?

    •  Provocation

    •  Self-defence

  • (a) Pre-trial judge’s summary of key issues on applications and at trial: blank line

    blank line

    blank line

  • 36 Non-contentious Issues –

    • Jurisdiction Admitted □ Not contested □
    • Identity of the accused Admitted □ Not contested □
    • Continuity of exhibits Admitted □ Not contested □
    • Medical Evidence Admitted □ Not contested □
    • Documentary Evidence Admitted □ Not contested □
    • Ownership Admitted □ Not contested □
    • Value of Property Admitted □ Not contested □
    • Accused as Driver Admitted □ Not contested □
    • Death/injuries caused by accused Admitted □ Not contested □
    • Expert’s report Admitted □ Not contested □
    • Age of Complainant Admitted □ Not contested □
    • Nature of drug Admitted □ Not contested □
    • Amount of drug is “for the purpose of trafficking” Admitted □ Not contested □
    • Value of drug Admitted □ Not contested □
    • Service of notice Admitted □ Not contested □
    • Photographs Admitted □ Not contested □
  • 37 Other factual, evidentiary or legal admissions agreed upon by defence N/A □

  • 38 Affidavit Evidence N/A □

    • a) Does the Crown intend to file affidavit evidence? Yes □ No □

    • b) If so, please specify: blank line

      blank line

      blank line

    • c) Will the defence seek leave to have the witness testify? Yes □ No □

    • d) Pre-trial judge’s Directions and Recommendations re. timing of application(s), filing requirements, evidentiary basis and time estimates:

      blank line

      blank line

      blank line

      blank line

  • 39 Positions of Parties

    • a) Upon what evidentiary basis does the Crown seek to establish liability for each accused?

      blank line

      blank line

    • b) Upon which section(s) of the Criminal Code does the Crown rely to establish the liability of each accused?

      blank line

    • c) Included offences? blank line

    • d) What is the position of the defence?

      blank line

  • 40. a) Will there be an application for the appointment of a Case Management Judge pursuant to s. 551.1?

    By the Crown: Yes □ No □

    By the Defence Yes □ No □

    Does the other party consent? Yes □ No □

    blank line

    blank line

    • b) Will there be an application for an order for a joint hearing of issues in common from separate prosecutions, pursuant to s. 551.7?

      By the Crown: Yes □ No □

      By the Defence Yes □ No □

      blank line

      blank line

  • 41 Pre-trial judge’s time estimates:blank line

    • a) Estimated time for applications: blank line

    • b) Estimated time for trial: blank line

    • c) Comments: blank line

      blank line

      blank line

  • 42 Additional Comments by pre-trial judge (including order and timing of pre-trial applications):blank line

    blank line

    blank line

    blank line

    blank line

    blank line

  • 43 Items to be addressed at next pre-trial, or by Case Management judge:blank line

    blank line

    blank line

    blank line

    blank line

    blank line

This page is to be removed before the form is provided to the trial judge.

  • Accused:blank line

    blank line

  • Pre-trial judge’s notes re. Resolution discussions:

    blank line

    blank line

    blank line

    blank line

    blank line

    blank line

    blank line

    blank line

    blank line

    blank line

    blank line

    blank line

    blank line

    blank line

    blank line

    blank line

    blank line

    blank line

    blank line

    blank line

    blank line

    blank line

    blank line

    blank line

    blank line

    blank line

    blank line

 
Date modified: