Divorce Act (R.S.C., 1985, c. 3 (2nd Supp.))
Full Document:
- HTMLFull Document: Divorce Act (Accessibility Buttons available) |
- XMLFull Document: Divorce Act [555 KB] |
- PDFFull Document: Divorce Act [953 KB]
Act current to 2024-10-30 and last amended on 2024-02-01. Previous Versions
AMENDMENTS NOT IN FORCE
— 2019, c. 16, s. 1(5)
1 (5) The definition spouse in subsection 2(1) of the Act is replaced by the following:
- spouse
spouse includes, in subsection 6(1) and sections 15.1 to 16.96, 21.1, 25.01, 25.1 and 30.7, a former spouse; (époux)
— 2019, c. 16, s. 7
7 Subsection 6.3(1) of the Act is replaced by the following:
Child habitually resident outside Canada
6.3 (1) Subject to sections 30 to 31.3, if a child of the marriage is not habitually resident in Canada, a court in the province that would otherwise have jurisdiction under sections 3 to 5 to make a parenting order or contact order, or a variation order in respect of such an order, has jurisdiction to do so only in exceptional circumstances and if the child is present in the province.
— 2019, c. 16, s. 20
20 The portion of subsection 22.1(1) of the Act before paragraph (a) is replaced by the following:
Recognition of foreign order that varies parenting or contact order
22.1 (1) Subject to sections 30 to 31.3, on application by an interested person, a court in a province that has a sufficient connection with the matter shall recognize a decision made by a competent authority that has the effect of varying, rescinding or suspending a parenting order or contact order, unless
— 2019, c. 16, s. 31
31 The Act is amended by adding the following before the heading before section 32:
Convention on Jurisdiction, Applicable Law, Recognition, Enforcement and Co-operation in Respect of Parental Responsibility and Measures for the Protection of Children
Definitions
Definitions
30 The following definitions apply in this section and in sections 30.1 to 31.3.
- 1996 Convention
1996 Convention means the Convention on Jurisdiction, Applicable Law, Recognition, Enforcement and Co-operation in Respect of Parental Responsibility and Measures for the Protection of Children, concluded at The Hague on October 19, 1996, set out in the schedule. (Convention de 1996)
- State Party
State Party means a State other than Canada in which the 1996 Convention applies. (État partie)
Implementation, Interpretation and Application of the 1996 Convention
Force of law
30.1 (1) The provisions of the 1996 Convention have the force of law in Canada in so far as they relate to subjects that fall within the legislative competence of Parliament.
Inconsistency
(2) The 1996 Convention prevails over this Act and any other federal law to the extent of any inconsistency between them.
Explanatory Report
30.2 In interpreting the 1996 Convention, recourse may be had to the Explanatory Report on the 1996 Hague Child Protection Convention, adopted by the Eighteenth Session of the Hague Conference on Private International Law that was held from September 30 to October 19, 1996.
Application
30.3 Sections 30.4 to 31.3 only apply in a province if
(a) Canada has made a declaration extending the application of the 1996 Convention to that province; and
(b) the child of the marriage concerned is under 18 years of age.
Jurisdiction
Child habitually resident in State Party
30.4 If a child concerned is habitually resident in a State Party, a court in a province does not have jurisdiction to hear and determine an application in respect of the child for a parenting order, a contact order or a variation order in respect of either such order, except in the circumstances set out in section 30.6, 30.7, 30.9 or 31.
Wrongful removal or retention
30.5 In the case of a wrongful removal or retention, as defined in Article 7(2) of the 1996 Convention, a court in a province has jurisdiction to hear and determine an application for a parenting order, a contact order or a variation order in respect of such orders only if the child has become habitually resident in that province and the conditions set out in subparagraphs 7(1)(a) or (b) of that Convention have been met.
Child present in province
30.6 If one or more of the circumstances set out in Article 6 of the 1996 Convention exist and the child is present in a province, a court in that province that would otherwise have jurisdiction under any of sections 3 to 5 of this Act has jurisdiction to hear and determine an application in respect of the child for a parenting order, a contact order or a variation order in respect of either such order.
Divorce proceeding — child habitually resident in State Party
30.7 (1) For the purposes of Article 10 of the 1996 Convention, if the child is habitually resident in a State Party, a court in a province that would otherwise have jurisdiction under section 3 of this Act has jurisdiction to make a parenting order or contact order in respect of the child if
(a) at least one of the spouses has parental responsibility in respect of the child;
(b) the spouses and any other person who has parental responsibility accept the jurisdiction of the court; and
(c) the court is satisfied that it is in the best interests of the child to exercise jurisdiction.
Definition of parental responsibility
(2) For the purposes of subsection (1), parental responsibility has the same meaning as in Article 1(2) of the 1996 Convention.
Transfer of Jurisdiction
State Party better placed to assess child’s best interests
30.8 For the purposes of Articles 8 and 9 of the 1996 Convention, a court in the province in which a child is habitually resident that would otherwise have jurisdiction under any of sections 3 to 6 of this Act, or that has jurisdiction under section 30.6 of this Act, may decline to exercise jurisdiction to make, in respect of the child, a parenting order, a contact order or a variation order in respect of such an order if the conditions of Article 8 or 9, as the case may be, are fulfilled and there is agreement between the court and the competent authority of a State Party that the latter will have jurisdiction.
Canadian court better placed to assess child’s best interests
30.9 For the purposes of Articles 8 and 9 of the 1996 Convention, only the court in a province that would otherwise have jurisdiction under any of sections 3 to 5 of this Act may exercise jurisdiction to make a parenting order, a contact order or a variation order in respect of such orders if the conditions of Article 8 or 9, as the case may be, are fulfilled and there is agreement between the competent authority of a State Party and the court that the latter will have jurisdiction.
Urgency
Urgent cases
31 For the purposes of Article 11 of the 1996 Convention, a court in a province that does not have jurisdiction under sections 30.4 to 30.9 of this Act but that would otherwise have jurisdiction under any of sections 3 to 5 of this Act, may, in urgent cases, make a parenting order, a contact order or a variation order in respect of either such order if the child who would be the subject of the order is present in that province.
Recognition
Recognition by operation of law
31.1 (1) For the purposes of Article 23 of the 1996 Convention, a measure taken by a competent authority of a State Party is a measure that has the effect of varying, rescinding or suspending a parenting order or contact order.
Measure taken deemed to be variation order
(2) A measure taken by a competent authority of a State Party that is recognized by operation of law under Article 23(1) of the 1996 Convention is deemed to be an order made under section 17 of this Act.
Extent of validity
(3) Despite subsection 20(2), the measure referred to in subsection (2) is valid only in any province to which the 1996 Convention applies.
Jurisdiction respecting recognition
31.2 (1) For the purposes of Article 24 of the 1996 Convention and on application by an interested person, a court in a province has jurisdiction to decide on the recognition of a measure referred to in section 31.1 of this Act if there is a sufficient connection between the matter and the province.
Effect of recognition
(2) The court’s decision recognizing the measure is deemed to be an order made under section 17 and has legal effect throughout Canada.
Effect of non-recognition
(3) The court’s decision refusing to recognize the measure has legal effect throughout Canada.
Enforcement
31.3 For the purposes of Article 26 of the 1996 Convention, a measure taken by a competent authority of a State Party that is enforceable in that State Party and that is to be enforced in a province may, on application by an interested person,
(a) be declared to be enforceable by a court in the province and enforced in that province as an order of that court; or
(b) be registered for the purposes of enforcement in the court in that province and enforced in that province as an order of that court.
— 2019, c. 16, s. 37
37 The schedule to the Act is renumbered as Schedule 1.
— 2019, c. 16, s. 39
39 The Act is amended by adding, after Schedule 1, the Schedule 2 set out in Schedule 2 to this Act.
SCHEDULE(Section 30)Convention on Jurisdiction, Applicable Law, Recognition, Enforcement and Co-operation in Respect of Parental Responsibility and Measures for the Protection of Children
The States signatory to the present Convention,
Considering the need to improve the protection of children in international situations,
Wishing to avoid conflicts between their legal systems in respect of jurisdiction, applicable law, recognition and enforcement of measures for the protection of children,
Recalling the importance of international co-operation for the protection of children,
Confirming that the best interests of the child are to be a primary consideration,
Noting that the Convention of 5 October 1961 concerning the powers of authorities and the law applicable in respect of the protection of minors is in need of revision,
Desiring to establish common provisions to this effect, taking into account the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child of 20 November 1989,
Have agreed on the following provisions —
Chapter I – Scope of the Convention
ARTICLE 1
1 The objects of the present Convention are –
a to determine the State whose authorities have jurisdiction to take measures directed to the protection of the person or property of the child;
b to determine which law is to be applied by such authorities in exercising their jurisdiction;
c to determine the law applicable to parental responsibility;
d to provide for the recognition and enforcement of such measures of protection in all Contracting States;
e to establish such co-operation between the authorities of the Contracting States as may be necessary in order to achieve the purposes of this Convention.
2 For the purposes of this Convention, the term “parental responsibility” includes parental authority, or any analogous relationship of authority determining the rights, powers and responsibilities of parents, guardians and other legal representatives in relation to the person or the property of the child.
ARTICLE 2
The Convention applies to children from the moment of their birth until they reach the age of 18 years.
ARTICLE 3
The measures referred to in Article 1 may deal in particular with –
a the attribution, exercise, termination or restriction of parental responsibility, as well as its delegation;
b rights of custody, including rights relating to the care of the person of the child and, in particular, the right to determine the child’s place of residence, as well as rights of access including the right to take a child for a limited period of time to a place other than the child’s habitual residence;
c guardianship, curatorship and analogous institutions;
d the designation and functions of any person or body having charge of the child’s person or property, representing or assisting the child;
e the placement of the child in a foster family or in institutional care, or the provision of care by kafala or an analogous institution;
f the supervision by a public authority of the care of a child by any person having charge of the child;
g the administration, conservation or disposal of the child’s property.
ARTICLE 4
The Convention does not apply to –
a the establishment or contesting of a parent-child relationship;
b decisions on adoption, measures preparatory to adoption, or the annulment or revocation of adoption;
c the name and forenames of the child;
d emancipation;
e maintenance obligations;
f trusts or succession;
g social security;
h public measures of a general nature in matters of education or health;
i measures taken as a result of penal offences committed by children;
j decisions on the right of asylum and on immigration.
Chapter II – Jurisdiction
ARTICLE 5
1 The judicial or administrative authorities of the Contracting State of the habitual residence of the child have jurisdiction to take measures directed to the protection of the child’s person or property.
2 Subject to Article 7, in case of a change of the child’s habitual residence to another Contracting State, the authorities of the State of the new habitual residence have jurisdiction.
ARTICLE 6
1 For refugee children and children who, due to disturbances occurring in their country, are internationally displaced, the authorities of the Contracting State on the territory of which these children are present as a result of their displacement have the jurisdiction provided for in paragraph 1 of Article 5.
2 The provisions of the preceding paragraph also apply to children whose habitual residence cannot be established.
ARTICLE 7
1 In case of wrongful removal or retention of the child, the authorities of the Contracting State in which the child was habitually resident immediately before the removal or retention keep their jurisdiction until the child has acquired a habitual resident in another State, and
a each person, institution or other body having rights of custody has acquiesced in the removal or retention; or
b the child has resided in that other State for a period of at least one year after the person, institution or other body having rights of custody has or should have had knowledge of the whereabouts of the child, no request for return lodged within that period is still pending, and the child is settled in his or her new environment.
2 The removal or the retention of a child is to be considered wrongful where
a it is in breach of rights of custody attributed to a person, an institution or any other body, either jointly or alone, under the law of the State in which the child was habitually resident immediately before the removal or retention; and
b at the time of removal or retention those rights were actually exercised, either jointly or alone, or would have been so exercised but for the removal or retention.
The rights of custody mentioned in sub-paragraph a above, may arise in particular by operation of law or by reason of a judicial or administrative decision, or by reason of an agreement having legal effect under the law of that State.
3 So long as the authorities first mentioned in paragraph 1 keep their jurisdiction, the authorities of the Contracting State to which the child has been removed or in which he or she has been retained can take only such urgent measures under Article 11 as are necessary for the protection of the person or property of the child.
ARTICLE 8
1 By way of exception, the authority of a Contracting State having jurisdiction under Article 5 or 6, if it considers that the authority of another Contracting State would be better placed in the particular case to assess the best interests of the child, may either
– request that other authority, directly or with the assistance of the Central Authority of its State, to assume jurisdiction to take such measures of protection as it considers to be necessary, or
– suspend consideration of the case and invite the parties to introduce such a request before the authority of that other State.
2 The Contracting States whose authorities may be addressed as provided in the preceding paragraph are
a a State of which the child is a national,
b a State in which property of the child is located,
c a State whose authorities are seised of an application for divorce or legal separation of the child’s parents, or for annulment of their marriage,
d a State with which the child has a substantial connection.
3 The authorities concerned may proceed to an exchange of views.
4 The authority addressed as provided in paragraph 1 may assume jurisdiction, in place of the authority having jurisdiction under Article 5 or 6, if it considers that this is in the child’s best interests.
ARTICLE 9
1 If the authorities of a Contracting State referred to in Article 8, paragraph 2, consider that they are better placed in the particular case to assess the child’s best interests, they may either
– request the competent authority of the Contracting State of the habitual residence of the child, directly or with the assistance of the Central Authority of that State, that they be authorized to exercise jurisdiction to take the measures of protection which they consider to be necessary, or
– invite the parties to introduce such a request before the authority of the Contracting State of the habitual residence of the child.
2 The authorities concerned may proceed to an exchange of views.
3 The authority initiating the request may exercise jurisdiction in place of the authority of the Contracting State of the habitual residence of the child only if the latter authority has accepted the request.
ARTICLE 10
1 Without prejudice to Articles 5 to 9, the authorities of a Contracting State exercising jurisdiction to decide upon an application for divorce or legal separation of the parents of a child habitually resident in another Contracting State, or for annulment of their marriage, may, if the law of their State so provides, take measures directed to the protection of the person or property of such child if
a at the time of commencement of the proceedings, one of his or her parents habitually resides in that State and one of them has parental responsibility in relation to the child, and
b the jurisdiction of these authorities to take such measures has been accepted by the parents, as well as by any other person who has parental responsibility in relation to the child, and is in the best interests of the child.
2 The jurisdiction provided for by paragraph 1 to take measures for the protection of the child ceases as soon as the decision allowing or refusing the application for divorce, legal separation or annulment of the marriage has become final, or the proceedings have come to an end for another reason.
ARTICLE 11
1 In all cases of urgency, the authorities of any Contracting State in whose territory the child or property belonging to the child is present have jurisdiction to take any necessary measures of protection.
2 The measures taken under the preceding paragraph with regard to a child habitually resident in a Contracting State shall lapse as soon as the authorities which have jurisdiction under Articles 5 to 10 have taken the measures required by the situation.
3 The measures taken under paragraph 1 with regard to a child who is habitually resident in a non-Contracting State shall lapse in each Contracting State as soon as measures required by the situation and taken by the authorities of another State are recognised in the Contracting State in question.
ARTICLE 12
1 Subject to Article 7, the authorities of a Contracting State in whose territory the child or property belonging to the child is present have jurisdiction to take measures of a provisional character for the protection of the person or property of the child which have a territorial effect limited to the State in question, in so far as such measures are not incompatible with measures already taken by authorities which have jurisdiction under Articles 5 to 10.
2 The measures taken under the preceding paragraph with regard to a child habitually resident in a Contracting State shall lapse as soon as the authorities which have jurisdiction under Articles 5 to 10 have taken a decision in respect of the measures of protection which may be required by the situation.
3 The measures taken under paragraph 1 with regard to a child who is habitually resident in a non-Contracting State shall lapse in the Contracting State where the measures were taken as soon as measures required by the situation and taken by the authorities of another State are recognised in the Contracting State in question.
ARTICLE 13
1 The authorities of a Contracting State which have jurisdiction under Articles 5 to 10 to take measures for the protection of the person or property of the child must abstain from exercising this jurisdiction if, at the time of the commencement of the proceedings, corresponding measures have been requested from the authorities of another Contracting State having jurisdiction under Articles 5 to 10 at the time of the request and are still under consideration.
2 The provisions of the preceding paragraph shall not apply if the authorities before whom the request for measures was initially introduced have declined jurisdiction.
ARTICLE 14
The measures taken in application of Articles 5 to 10 remain in force according to their terms, even if a change of circumstances has eliminated the basis upon which jurisdiction was founded, so long as the authorities which have jurisdiction under the Convention have not modified, replaced or terminated such measures.
Chapter III – Applicable Law
ARTICLE 15
1 In exercising their jurisdiction under the provisions of Chapter II, the authorities of the Contracting States shall apply their own law.
2 However, in so far as the protection of the person or the property of the child requires, they may exceptionally apply or take into consideration of the law of another State with which the situation has a substantial connection.
3 If the child’s habitual residence changes to another Contracting State, the law of that other State governs, from the time of the change, the conditions of application of the measures taken in the State of the former habitual residence.
ARTICLE 16
1 The attribution or extinction of parental responsibility by operation of law, without the intervention of a judicial or administrative authority, is governed by the law of the State of the habitual residence of the child.
2 The attribution or extinction of parental responsibility by an agreement or a unilateral act, without intervention of a judicial or administrative authority, is governed by the law of the State of the child’s habitual residence at the time when the agreement or unilateral act takes effect.
3 Parental responsibility which exists under the law of the State of the child’s habitual residence subsists after a change of that habitual residence to another State.
4 If the child’s habitual residence changes, the attribution of parental responsibility by operation of law to a person who does not already have such responsibility is governed by the law of the State of the new habitual residence.
ARTICLE 17
The exercise of parental responsibility is governed by the law of the State of the child’s habitual residence. If the child’s habitual residence changes, it is governed by the law of the State of the new habitual residence.
ARTICLE 18
The parental responsibility referred to in Article 16 may be terminated, or the conditions of its exercise modified, by measures taken under this Convention.
ARTICLE 19
1 The validity of a transaction entered into between a third party and another person who would be entitled to act as the child’s legal representative under the law of the State where the transaction was concluded cannot be contested, and the third party cannot be held liable, on the sole ground that the other person was not entitled to act as the child’s legal representative under the law designated by the provisions of this Chapter, unless the third party knew or should have known that the parental responsibility was governed by the latter law.
2 The preceding paragraph applies only if the transaction was entered into between persons present on the territory of the same State.
ARTICLE 20
The provisions of this Chapter apply even if the law designated by them is the law of a non-Contracting State.
ARTICLE 21
1 In this Chapter the term “law” means the law in force in a State other than its choice of law rules.
2 However, if the law applicable according to Article 16 is that of a non-Contracting State and if the choice of law rules of that State designate the law of another non-Contracting State which would apply its own law, the law of the latter State applies. If that other non-Contracting State would not apply its own law, the applicable law is that designated by Article 16.
ARTICLE 22
The application of the law designated by the provisions of this Chapter can be refused only if this application would be manifestly contrary to public policy, taking into account the best interests of the child.
Chapter IV – Recognition and Enforcement
ARTICLE 23
1 The measures taken by the authorities of a Contracting State shall be recognised by operation of law in all other Contracting States.
2 Recognition may however be refused –
a if the measure was taken by an authority whose jurisdiction was not based on one of the grounds provided for in Chapter II;
b if the measure was taken, except in a case of urgency, in the context of a judicial or administrative proceeding, without the child having been provided the opportunity to be heard, in violation of fundamental principles of procedure of the requested State;
c on the request of any person claiming that the measure infringes his or her parental responsibility, if such measure was taken, except in a case of urgency, without such person having been given an opportunity to be heard;
d if such recognition is manifestly contrary to public policy of the requested State, taking into account the best interests of the child;
e if the measure is incompatible with a later measure taken in the non-Contracting State of the habitual residence of the child, where this later measure fulfils the requirements for recognition in the requested State;
f if the procedure provided in Article 33 has not been complied with.
ARTICLE 24
Without prejudice to Article 23, paragraph 1, any interested person may request from the competent authorities of a Contracting State that they decide on the recognition or non-recognition of a measure taken in another Contracting State. The procedure is governed by the law of the requested State.
ARTICLE 25
The authority of the requested State is bound by the findings of fact on which the authority of the State where the measure was taken based its jurisdiction.
ARTICLE 26
1 If measures taken in one Contracting State and enforceable there require enforcement in another Contracting State, they shall, upon request by an interested party, be declared enforceable or registered for the purpose of enforcement in that other State according to the procedure provided in the law of the latter State.
2 Each Contracting State shall apply to the declaration of enforceability or registration a simple and rapid procedure.
3 The declaration of enforceability or registration may be refused only for one of the reasons set out in Article 23, paragraph 2.
ARTICLE 27
Without prejudice to such review as is necessary in the application of the preceding Articles, there shall be no review of the merits of the measure taken.
ARTICLE 28
Measures taken in one Contracting State and declared enforceable, or registered for the purpose of enforcement, in another Contracting State shall be enforced in the latter State as if they had been taken by the authorities of that State. Enforcement takes place in accordance with the law of the requested State to the extent provided by such law, taking into consideration the best interests of the child.
Chapter V – Co-operation
ARTICLE 29
1 A Contracting State shall designate a Central Authority to discharge the duties which are imposed by the Convention on such authorities.
2 Federal States, States with more than one system of law or States having autonomous territorial units shall be free to appoint more than one Central Authority and to specify the territorial or personal extent of their functions. Where a State has appointed more than one Central Authority, it shall designate the Central Authority to which any communication may be addressed for transmission to the appropriate Central Authority within that State.
ARTICLE 30
1 Central Authorities shall co-operate with each other and promote co-operation amongst the competent authorities in their States to achieve the purposes of the Convention.
2 They shall, in connection with the application of the Convention, take appropriate steps to provide information as to the laws of, and services available in, their States relating to the protection of children.
ARTICLE 31
The Central Authority of a Contracting State, either directly or through public authorities or other bodies, shall take all appropriate steps to –
(a) faciliate the communications and offer the assistance provided for in Articles 8 and 9 and in this Chapter;
(b) facilitate, by mediation, conciliation or similar means, agreed solutions for the protection of the person or property of the child in situations to which the Convention applies;
(c) provide, on the request of a competent authority of another Contracting State, assistance in discovering the whereabouts of a child where it appears that the child may be present and in need of protection within the territory of the requested State.
ARTICLE 32
On a request made with supporting reasons by the Central Authority or other competent authority of any Contracting State with which the child has a substantial connection, the Central Authority of the Contracting State in which the child is habitually resident and present may, directly or through public authorities or other bodies,
a provide a report on the situation of the child;
b request the competent authority of its State to consider the need to take measures for the protection of the person or property of the child.
ARTICLE 33
1 If an authority having jurisdiction under Articles 5 to 10 contemplates the placement of the child in a foster family or institutional care, or the provision of care by kafala or an analogous institution, and if such placement or such provision of care is to take place in another Contracting State, it shall first consult with the Central Authority or other competent authority of the latter State. To that effect it shall transmit a report on the child together with the reasons for the proposed placement or provision of care.
2 The decision on the placement or provision of care may be made in the requesting State only if the Central Authority or other competent authority of the requested State has consented to the placement or provision of care, taking into account the child’s best interests.
ARTICLE 34
1 Where a measure of protection is contemplated, the competent authorities under the Convention, if the situation of the child so requires, may request any authority of another Contracting State which has information relevant to the protection of the child to communicate such information.
2 A Contracting State may declare that requests under paragraph 1 shall be communicated to its authorities only through its Central Authority.
ARTICLE 35
1 The competent authorities of a Contracting State may request the authorities of another Contracting State to assist in the implementation of measures of protection taken under this Convention, especially in securing the effective exercise of rights of access as well as of the right to maintain direct contacts on a regular basis.
2 The authorities of a Contracting State in which the child does not habitually reside may, on the request of a parent residing in that State who is seeking to obtain or to maintain access to the child, gather information or evidence and may make a finding on the suitability of that parent to exercise access and on the conditions under which access is to be exercised. An authority exercising jurisdiction under Articles 5 to 10 to determine an application concerning access to the child, shall admit and consider such information, evidence and finding before reaching its decision.
3 An authority having jurisdiction under Articles 5 to 10 to decide on access may adjourn a proceeding pending the outcome of a request made under paragraph 2, in particular, when it is considering an application to restrict or terminate access rights granted in the State of the child’s former habitual residence.
4 Nothing in this Article shall prevent an authority having jurisdiction under Articles 5 to 10 from taking provisional measures pending the outcome of the request made under paragraph 2.
ARTICLE 36
In any case where the child is exposed to a serious danger, the competent authorities of the Contracting State where measures for the protection of the child have been taken or are under consideration, if they are informed that the child’s residence has changed to, or that the child is present in another State, shall inform the authorities of that other State about the danger involved and the measures taken or under consideration.
ARTICLE 37
An authority shall not request or transmit any information under this Chapter if to do so would, in its opinion, be likely to place the child’s person or property in danger, or constitute a serious threat to the liberty or life of a member of the child’s family.
ARTICLE 38
1 Without prejudice to the possibility of imposing reasonable charges for the provision of services, Central Authorities and other public authorities of Contracting States shall bear their own costs in applying the provisions of this Chapter.
2 Any Contracting State may enter into agreements with one or more other Contracting States concerning the allocation of charges.
ARTICLE 39
Any Contracting State may enter into agreements with one or more other Contracting States with a view to improving the application of this Chapter in their mutual relations. The States which have concluded such an agreement shall transmit a copy to the depositary of the Convention.
Chapter VI – General Provisions
ARTICLE 40
1 The authorities of the Contracting State of the child’s habitual residence, or of the Contracting State where a measure of protection has been taken, may deliver to the person having parental responsibility or to the person entrusted with protection of the child’s person or property, at his or her request, a certificate indicating the capacity in which that person is entitled to act and the powers conferred upon him or her.
2 The capacity and powers indicated in the certificate are presumed to be vested in that person, in the absence of proof to the contrary.
3 Each Contracting State shall designate the authorities competent to draw up the certificate.
ARTICLE 41
Personal data gathered or transmitted under the Convention shall be used only for the purposes for which they were gathered or transmitted.
ARTICLE 42
The authorities to whom information is transmitted shall ensure its confidentiality, in accordance with the law of their State.
ARTICLE 43
All documents forwarded or delivered under this Convention shall be exempt from legalisation or any analogous formality.
ARTICLE 44
Each Contracting State may designate the authorities to which requests under Articles 8, 9 and 33 are to be addressed.
ARTICLE 45
1 The designations referred to in Articles 29 and 44 shall be communicated to the Permanent Bureau of the Hague Conference on Private International Law.
2 The declaration referred to in Article 34, paragraph 2, shall be made to the depositary of the Convention.
ARTICLE 46
A Contracting State in which different systems of law or sets of rules of law apply to the protection of the child and his or her property shall not be bound to apply the rules of the Convention to conflicts solely between such different systems or sets of rules of law.
ARTICLE 47
In relation to a State in which two or more systems of law or sets of rules of law with regard to any matter dealt with in this Convention apply in different territorial units –
1 any reference to habitual residence in that State shall be construed as referring to habitual residence in a territorial unit;
2 any reference to the presence of the child in that State shall be construed as referring to presence in a territorial unit;
3 any reference to the location of property of the child in that State shall be construed as referring to location of property of the child in a territorial unit;
4 any reference to the State of which the child is a national shall be construed as referring to the territorial unit designated by the law of that State or, in the absence of relevant rules, to the territorial unit with which the child has the closest connection;
5 any reference to the State whose authorities are seised of an application for divorce or legal separation of the child’s parents, or for annulment of their marriage, shall be construed as referring to the territorial unit whose authorities are seised of such application;
6 any reference to the State with which the child has a substantial connection shall be construed as referring to the territorial unit with which the child has such connection;
7 any reference to the State to which the child has been removed or in which he or she has been retained shall be construed as referring to the relevant territorial unit to which the child has been removed or in which he or she has been retained;
8 any reference to bodies or authorities of that State, other than Central Authorities, shall be construed as referring to those authorised to act in the relevant territorial unit;
9 any reference to the law or procedure or authority of the State in which a measure has been taken shall be construed as referring to the law or procedure or authority of the territorial unit in which such measure was taken;
10 any reference to the law or procedure or authority of the requested State shall be construed as referring to the law or procedure or authority of the territorial unit in which recognition or enforcement is sought.
ARTICLE 48
For the purpose of identifying the applicable law under Chapter III, in relation to a State which comprises two or more territorial units each of which has its own system of law or set of rules of law in respect of matters covered by this Convention, the following rules apply –
a if there are rules in force in such a State identifying which territorial unit’s law is applicable, the law of that unit applies;
b in the absence of such rules, the law of the relevant territorial unit as defined in Article 47 applies.
ARTICLE 49
For the purpose of identifying the applicable law under Chapter III, in relation to a State which has two or more systems of law or sets of rules of law applicable to different categories of persons in respect of matters covered by this Convention, the following rules apply –
a if there are rules in force in such a State identifying which among such laws applies, that law applies;
b in the absence of such rules, the law of the system or the set of rules of law with which the child has the closest connection applies.
ARTICLE 50
This Convention shall not affect the application of the Convention of 25 October 1980 on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction, as between Parties to both Conventions. Nothing, however, precludes provisions of this Convention from being invoked for the purposes of obtaining the return of a child who has been wrongfully removed or retained or of organising access rights.
ARTICLE 51
In relations between the Contracting States this Convention replaces the Convention of 5 October 1961 concerning the powers of authorities and the law applicable in respect of the protection of minors, and the Convention governing the guardianship of minors, signed at The Hague 12 June 1902, without prejudice to the recognition of measures taken under the Convention of 5 October 1961 mentioned above.
ARTICLE 52
1 This Convention does not affect any international instrument to which Contracting States are Parties and which contains provisions on matters governed by the Convention, unless a contrary declaration is made by the States Parties to such instrument.
2 This Convention does not affect the possibility for one or more Contracting States to conclude agreements which contain, in respect of children habitually resident in any of the States Parties to such agreements, provisions on matters governed by this Convention.
3 Agreements to be concluded by one or more Contracting States on matters within the scope of this Convention do not affect, in the relationship of such States with other Contracting States, the application of the provisions of this Convention.
4 The preceding paragraphs also apply to uniform laws based on special ties of a regional or other nature between the States concerned.
ARTICLE 53
1 The Convention shall apply to measures only if they are taken in a State after the Convention has entered into force for that State.
2 The Convention shall apply to the recognition and enforcement of measures taken after its entry into force as between the State where the measures have been taken and the requested State.
ARTICLE 54
1 Any communication sent to the Central Authority or to another authority of a Contracting State shall be in the original language, and shall be accompanied by a translation into the official language or one of the official languages of the other State or, where that is not feasible, a translation into French or English.
2 However, a Contracting State may, by making a reservation in accordance with Article 60, object to the use of either French or English, but not both.
ARTICLE 55
1 A Contracting State may, in accordance with Article 60,
a reserve the jurisdiction of its authorities to take measures directed to the protection of property of a child situated on its territory;
b reserve the right not to recognize any parental responsibility or measure in so far as it is incompatible with any measure taken by its authorities in relation to that property.
2 The reservation may be restricted to certain categories of property.
ARTICLE 56
The Secretary General of the Hague Conference on Private International Law shall at regular intervals convoke a Special Commission in order to review the practical operation of the Convention.
Chapter VII – Final Clauses
ARTICLE 57
1 The Convention shall be open for signature by the States which were Members of the Hague Conference on Private International Law at the time of its Eighteenth Session.
2 It shall be ratified, accepted or approved and the instruments of ratification, acceptance or approval shall be deposited with the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Kingdom of the Netherlands, depositary of the Convention.
ARTICLE 58
1 Any other State may accede to the Convention after it has entered into force in accordance with Article 61, paragraph 1.
2 The instrument of accession shall be deposited with the depositary.
3 Such accession shall have effect only as regards the relations between the acceding State and those Contracting States which have not raised an objection to its accession in the six months after the receipt of the notification referred to in sub-paragraph b of Article 63. Such an objection may also be raised by States at the time when they ratify, accept or approve the Convention after an accession. Any such objection shall be notified to the depositary.
ARTICLE 59
1 If a State has two or more territorial units in which different systems of law are applicable in relation to matters dealt with in this Convention, it may at the time of signature, ratification, acceptance, approval or accession declare that the Convention shall extend to all its territorial units or only to one or more of them and may modify this declaration by submitting another declaration at any time.
2 Any such declaration shall be notified to the depositary and shall state expressly the territorial units to which the Convention applies.
3 If a State makes no declaration under this Article, the Convention is to extend to all territorial units of that State.
ARTICLE 60
1 Any State may, not later than the time of ratification, acceptance, approval or accession, or at the time of making a declaration in terms of Article 59, make one or both of the reservations provided for in Articles 54, paragraph 2, and 55. No other reservation shall be permitted.
2 Any State may at any time withdraw a reservation it has made. The withdrawal shall be notified to the depositary.
3 The reservation shall cease to have effect on the first day of the third calendar month after the notification referred to in preceding paragraph.
ARTICLE 61
1 The Convention shall enter into force on the first day of the month following the expiration of three months after the deposit of the third instrument of ratification, acceptance or approval referred to in Article 57.
2 Thereafter the Convention shall enter into force –
a for each State ratifying, accepting or approving it subsequently, on the first day of the month following the expiration of three months after the deposit of its instrument of ratification, acceptance, approval or accession;
b for each State acceding, on the first day of the month following the expiration of three months after the expiration of the period of six months provided in Article 58, paragraph 3;
c for a territorial unit to which the Convention has been extended in conformity with Article 59, on the first day of the month following the expiration of three months after the notification referred to in that Article.
ARTICLE 62
1 A State Party to the Convention may denounce it by a notification in writing addressed to the depositary. The denunciation may be limited to certain territorial units to which the Convention applies.
2 The denunciation takes effect on the first day of the month following the expiration of twelve months after the notification is received by the depositary. Where a longer period for the denunciation to take effect is specified in the notification, the denunciation takes effect upon the expiration of such longer period.
ARTICLE 63
The depositary shall notify the States Members of the Hague Conference on Private International Law and the States which have acceded in accordance with Article 58 of the following –
a the signatures, ratifications, acceptances and approvals referred to in Article 57;
b the accessions and objections raised to accessions referred to in Article 58;
c the date on which the Convention enters into force in accordance with Article 61;
d the declarations referred to in Articles 34, paragraph 2, and 59;
e the agreements referred to in Article 39;
f the reservations referred to in Articles 54, paragraph 2, and 55 and the withdrawals referred to in Article 60, paragraph 2;
g the denunciations referred to in Article 62.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF the undersigned, being duly authorised thereto, have signed this Convention.
DONE at The Hague, on the 19th day of October 1996, in the English and French languages, both texts being equally authentic, in a single copy which shall be deposited in the archives of the Government of the Kingdom of the Netherlands, and of which a certified copy shall be sent, through diplomatic channels, to each of the States Members of the Hague Conference on Private International Law at the date of its Eighteenth Session.
Certified true copy of the original
The Director of Treaties of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Kingdom of the Netherlands
— 2019, c. 16, s. 40
40 The reference to “the schedule” in the definition 2007 Convention in section 28 of the Act is replaced by a reference to “Schedule 1”.
— 2019, c. 16, s. 41
41 The reference to “the schedule” in the definition 1996 Convention in section 30 of the Act is replaced by a reference to “Schedule 2”.
- Date modified: