PART IIIMethods of Proof and Forbidden Types of Evidence (continued)
DIVISION VIConfessions of Accused Persons (continued)
Evidence Discovered from Inadmissible Confession
47 Where an official or unofficial confession is inadmissible under section 40 or 42, but has led to the discovery of other evidence of independent probative value tending to show the accused guilty as charged, that evidence may be given or produced in the usual way by prosecution witnesses, and they may also tell the court that the evidence was discovered because of information given by the accused, but there shall be no other reference to the inadmissible confession.
48 Except as provided in these Rules, an accused person, when giving evidence, has no privilege against self-incrimination by his own statements.
Statements not Treated as Confessions
49 A statement that meets the conditions for admission in section 27, 28, 29, 30 or 60 need not also meet the requirements of this Division, though the statement is classifiable as an unofficial confession.
DIVISION VIIOther Kinds of Hearsay Evidence
Statements by Persons Other than Accused made in Judicial or Other Official Proceedings
(2) When an accused person has been tried by court martial and found guilty, but a new trial on the same charge has been ordered, evidence given at the former trial by a witness other than the accused may be quoted at the new trial when proved as provided by Division XII if it appears that
(a) the former witness is not available to testify at the new trial because he refuses to be sworn or to give evidence at the new trial, or he is dead, or insane, or absent from the country where the trial is being held, or so ill as to be unable to travel; and
(b) the evidence of the former witness was given in such circumstances that the parties had full opportunity to exercise their respective rights of examination of the witness.
(2) The making and content of a public document may be proved in the manner provided in Division XII without requiring the personal appearance of the maker as a witness.
(3) A public officer making a public document need not have personally observed or experienced the facts that he records or certifies by virtue of his duty or office; it is enough if the information concerned has come to him in a manner considered reliable and usual in the discharge of his duty or the exercise of his authority, and this includes facts reported to him by his superiors, equals or subordinates or by members of his staff, when acting in the discharge of their duties or the exercise of their authorities.
(4) Public documents may be in any form including registers, records, books, maps, recordings, photographs, returns, reports and letters.
(5) It is immaterial for purposes of admission how public documents are filed, collected, bound or stored by the person or persons responsible for their custody, or whether such documents are normally classified for security purposes and it is not a requirement for its admissibility that a public document should form part of a register or record to which members of the general public are entitled to access, it is enough if the document was made for any official purpose.
Public Documents of Other Countries
52 (1) For the purposes of this section, a public officer of a country other than Canada is a person who in the opinion of the judge advocate appears to hold an equivalent position and to possess similar authority to a Canadian public officer.
(2) The judge advocate may permit a documentary statement made for an official purpose by a public officer of a country other than Canada to be admitted in evidence to the same extent and in the same manner that an equivalent Canadian public document would be admissible under section 51 and Division XII.
Documents of Canadian Forces
53 Subject to section 55, and without limiting the general provisions of section 51, the following classes of service documents are deemed to be public documents and may be proved in the manner provided in Division XII without requiring the personal appearance of the maker as a witness:
(a) orders and instructions issued in writing by or on behalf of military commanders under the authority of Queen’s Regulations and Orders;
(b) official gradation and seniority lists; and
(c) documents and records kept for official purposes, including those kept in respect of officers and men.
54 Subject to section 55, a record in any business of an act, condition or event, in so far as relevant, shall be admissible in evidence if proved under section 106 or 107.
Limitations on Admission of Certain Documents
55 Except as specified in this article, and notwithstanding sections 51, 52, 53 and 54, the following documents shall not be admitted in evidence at a court martial:
(a) a synopsis prepared pursuant to QR&O 109.02;
(b) a report of a civil or military investigation relating to the alleged offence;
(c) a document that contains a statement classifiable as an official or unofficial confession by the accused except when such evidence is admissible under Division VI;
(d) the record of evidence given before, or the findings or decision of, another judicial or official tribunal or body specifically concerned with the investigation of or punitive action in relation to, the acts and events that form the subject of the charge against the accused before the court martial in question except when necessary as evidence in support of a plea of the accused in bar of trial on the basis of a previous acquittal or conviction for the same offence in accordance with section 56 of the National Defence Act and QR&O 112.24, or when admissible under section 40 or 50; or
(e) the record of a previous conviction of the accused by a judicial or disciplinary tribunal, except when such evidence is admissible under paragraph (d), Division IV or section 99.
Expert Opinion as Hearsay
56 When the opinion evidence of an expert admissible under Division VIII is based in whole or in part on the hearsay statement of another expert in the same field, that statement is admissible as part of or as a basis for the opinion evidence.
Statements in Learned Treatises
57 Statements in a learned treatise are admissible in evidence if the treatise is identified as authoritative by a witness who is expert in the field with which the treatise is concerned, and any expert in the same field may be asked to explain statements in the treatise.
Mode of Proving Documentary Statements and Effect of Admission
59 (1) Except where special provision is made in these Rules, the party who seeks to rely on a documentary statement admissible under this Division must prove the existence, character and content of the document concerned by primary or secondary evidence in accordance with Division XII.
(2) The admission of a document does not mean that statements contained in it must be accepted as accurate.
(3) The probative value of a documentary statement, the character and content of which has been established, is a matter for the court to determine.
Kinds of Hearsay not Specifically Covered
60 A hearsay statement of a kind not specifically dealt with in Divisions V, VI and VII is admissible and may be quoted by a reporting witness, if
(a) it would be admissible in a trial involving the same charge or issue in a civil court sitting in Ottawa; and
(b) its admission would not reduce in any way the rights and privileges of the accused against self-incrimination as provided by these Rules.
Opinion — General Rule
61 Except as provided in this Division and Divisions IV and VII, the opinion of a witness is not admissible in evidence.
62 (1) When permitted to give an opinion under this Division or Division VII, an expert witness may give the court that opinion whether or not he has observed the facts needing further interpretation.
(2) Unless leave is granted by the judge advocate before any experts have been called by a party, not more than three experts may be examined by that party.
Opinion of Expert Witness
(2) An expert witness may be questioned as to the grounds of his opinion, and in answering may quote the hearsay statement of another expert in the same field.
Opinion Evidence of Ordinary Witness
(2) An ordinary witness may give his opinion under subsection (1) whether or not he can remember the particular personally observed or experienced facts on which he based his opinion, if it was so based.
(3) An ordinary witness shall not give his opinion under subsection (1) if the members of the court are clearly in as good a position as is the witness himself to form the necessary opinion.
(4) When permitted to give an opinion under subsection (1), an ordinary witness may be questioned as to the grounds of his opinion.
- Date modified: